This is a quintessential example of how cognitive bias works (that’s quite a large matter you’ll be able to look it up if you would like). Anyway, in this article my motive is to discover the connections between meals and vitality together with costs involved, and clearly the future of meals.
If you take a look at this broadly, we definitely can see that meals is becoming a challenge in future. Eroding agriculture and land, meat based mostly eating regimen, excessive nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in fertilizers and the burning of fossil fuel are linked to meals production. These dependencies play a significant role in deciding meals costs.
The rationale behind sustainability of the human race is partly because of the innovations in food and Refinery Equipment manufacture its production. Here’s what our race has achieved:
– Domestication – that is what set apart hunting/gathering
– Technology – machinery that helped harvesting/planting/and so forth
– Chemical fertilizers
– The green revolution – allowing plant breeding for elevated standards of food
– Crop protection – herbicides, insecticides and fungicides (made from petroleum)
These innovations not only aided the human race but also coupled energy with food. If you’re taking a moment to think about it, the final product – a vegetable – that’s mendacity in your fridge right now, was planted as a seed, grown with fertilizers, preserved with pesticides, given enough water, harvested, processed, transported right into a wholesale market, bought by your vendor in your native retailer and then bought by you. This chain maybe longer or shorter, however the costs add up.
So pretty obviously various types of vitality (fossil fuels, chemical) add to the original cost of food. The cost concerned in food production is rising every day and the energy forms used are subject to other challenges resembling local weather change. Also, fossil fuel is running out and is in demand – in turn getting costlier. It’s an intertwined downside. That’s exactly why I find the meme on high absurd – because we aren’t “going green by selecting to eat meat over plant; in truth we’re simply indirectly sucking much more power out of the planet as meat production calls for much more vitality.
Courtesy – Scientific American
Properly, the scenario isn’t so bad in any case. Due to science and engineering, we’ve got options that might work.
Genetic Engineering: Research on this subject is making an attempt to substitute bacterial genes with good genes therefore avoiding the need to spray pesticides.
Precision agriculture: The western world is using GPS to seek out the exact soil areas of varying grade, and deal with them accordingly.
Environmental footprint food label: Quickly enough when you buy meals merchandise you will be capable of see the energy it consumed by way of gasoline, fertilizer, water, land and etc. It will force the market to observe setting safe procedures for meals production and the buyer can have the selection to select probably the most vitality environment friendly product.
Plant based weight loss plan: After all that is a private selection.
In a country like India, the place farmers are still fighting for a fair worth available in the market for their crops, all the above could seem like a dream that’s far, far away. Starvation increases daily. Costs rise. And nonetheless the issues aren’t resolved. Solutions aren’t sufficient and they cannot change the system in a single day. We need fast, but huge effort.
Personally, I feel in about two to a few a long time, the man who is aware of how you can farm and produces his personal meals could have the ‘hottest job. Energy environment friendly food will become the next huge thing. And as engineers, if we put our minds collectively, we may contribute a factor or two, hopefully.