The Third Carbon Age
With regards to energy and economics in the climate-change period, nothing is what it appears. Most of us consider (or need to believe) that the second carbon period, the Age of Oil, will soon be superseded by the Age of Renewables, simply as oil had lengthy since superseded the Age of Coal. President Obama offered precisely this vision in a much-praised June handle on local weather change. True, fossil fuels will be needed a bit of bit longer, he indicated, however soon enough they are going to be overtaken by renewable types of vitality.
Many different consultants share this view, assuring us that increased reliance on “clean” pure fuel combined with expanded investments in wind and solar energy will permit a easy transition to a inexperienced vitality future during which humanity will now not be pouring carbon dioxide and different greenhouse gases into the environment. All this sounds promising indeed. There is just one fly in the ointment: it’s not, in reality, the trail we are presently headed down. The vitality industry isn’t investing in any vital means in renewables. As a substitute, it’s pouring its historic profits into new fossil-fuel tasks, primarily involving the exploitation of what are known as “unconventional” oil and gas reserves.
The result’s indisputable: humanity just isn’t coming into a interval that will likely be dominated by renewables. As a substitute, it is pioneering the third nice carbon era, the Age of Unconventional Oil and Fuel.
That we’re embarking on a brand new carbon period is increasingly evident and should unnerve us all. Hydro-fracking — the usage of high-pressure water columns to shatter underground shale formations and liberate the oil and pure fuel provides trapped within them — is being undertaken in ever more areas of the United States and in a growing variety of foreign international locations. Within the meantime, the exploitation of carbon-soiled heavy oil and tar sands formations is accelerating in Canada, Venezuela, and elsewhere.
It’s true that ever more wind farms and photo voltaic arrays are being built, but here’s the j petroleum geology korea kicker: investment in unconventional fossil-gasoline extraction and distribution is now expected to outpace spending on renewables by a ratio of no less than three-to-one within the many years forward.
According to the International Energy Company (IEA), an inter-governmental analysis group based mostly in Paris, cumulative worldwide investment in new fossil-gasoline extraction and processing will whole an estimated $22.87 trillion between 2012 and 2035, whereas funding in renewables, hydropower, and nuclear energy will quantity to solely $7.32 trillion. In these years, investment in oil alone, at an estimated $10.32 trillion, is expected to exceed spending on wind, solar, geothermal, biofuels, hydro, nuclear, and each different type of renewable energy mixed.
As well as, because the IEA explains, an ever-increasing share of that staggering funding in fossil fuels will probably be devoted to unconventional types of oil and gas: Canadian tar sands, Venezuelan extra-heavy crude, shale oil and fuel, Arctic and deep-offshore vitality deposits, and other hydrocarbons derived from beforehand inaccessible reserves of power. The reason for this is straightforward enough. The world’s provide of typical oil and gas — fuels derived from simply accessible reservoirs and requiring a minimum of processing — is rapidly disappearing. With international demand for fossil fuels anticipated to rise by 26% between now and 2035, more and more of the world’s vitality provide must be provided by unconventional fuels.
In such a world, one thing is assured: international carbon emissions will soar far past our current worst-case assumptions, which means intense heat waves will turn out to be commonplace and our few remaining wilderness areas will probably be eviscerated. Planet Earth might be a far — presumably unimaginably — harsher and more blistering place. In that light, it’s value exploring in higher depth simply how we ended up in such a predicament, one carbon age at a time.
The primary Carbon Period
The first carbon era started within the late 1800s, with the introduction of coal-powered steam engines and their widespread utility to all method of industrial enterprises. Initially used to power textile mills and industrial plants, coal was additionally employed in transportation (steam-powered ships and railroads), j petroleum geology korea mining, and the large-scale manufacturing of iron. Indeed, what we now call the Industrial Revolution was largely comprised of the widening software of coal and steam power to productive actions. Ultimately, coal would also be used to generate electricity, a field by which it remains dominant right now.
This was the era wherein huge armies of exhausting-pressed employees built continent-spanning railroads and mammoth textile mills as manufacturing facility towns proliferated and cities grew. It was the era, above all, of the expansion of the British Empire. For a time, Great Britain was the most important producer and consumer of coal, the world’s leading manufacturer, its high industrial innovator, and its dominant power — and all of those attributes were inextricably related. By mastering the know-how of coal, a small island off the coast of Europe was able to accumulate vast wealth, develop the world’s most advanced weaponry, and control the global sea-lanes.
The same coal expertise that gave Britain such international advantages also introduced great misery in its wake. As famous by energy analyst Paul Roberts in the long run of Oil, the coal then being consumed in England was of the brown lignite selection, “chock filled with sulfur and different impurities.” When burned, “it produced an acrid, choking smoke that stung the eyes and lungs and blackened partitions and clothes.” By the end of the nineteenth century, the air in London and other coal-powered cities was so polluted that “trees died, marble facades dissolved, and respiratory ailments turned epidemic.”
For Nice Britain and different early industrial powers, the substitution of oil and gasoline for coal was a godsend, allowing improved air quality, the restoration of cities, and a reduction in respiratory ailments. In many elements of the world, of course, the Age of Coal shouldn’t be over. In China and India, amongst other locations, coal remains the principal source of power, condemning their cities and populations to a twenty-first-century model of nineteenth-century London and Manchester.
The Second Carbon Period
The Age of Oil received its start in 1859 when industrial manufacturing started in western Pennsylvania, however solely really took off after World War II, with the explosive progress of automobile ownership. Before 1940, oil played an vital role in illumination and lubrication, amongst different purposes, however remained subordinate to coal; after the battle, oil grew to become the world’s principal source of vitality. From 10 million barrels per day in 1950, world consumption soared to 77 million in 2000, a half-century bacchanalia of fossil fuel burning.
Driving the worldwide ascendancy of petroleum was its shut association with the internal combustion engine (ICE). As a consequence of oil’s superior portability and power depth (that is, the quantity of vitality it releases per unit of quantity), it makes the perfect gasoline for cellular, versatile ICEs. Simply as coal rose to prominence by fueling steam engines, so oil got here to prominence by fueling the world’s growing fleets of automobiles, trucks, planes, trains, and ships. At present, petroleum supplies about 97% of all power utilized in transportation worldwide.
Oil’s prominence was additionally assured by its growing utilization in agriculture and warfare. In a relatively short time period, oil-powered tractors and different agricultural machines replaced animals as the first source of power on farms around the world. An analogous transition occurred on the fashionable battlefield, with oil-powered tanks and planes changing the cavalry as the main supply of offensive energy.
These were the years of mass car ownership, continent-spanning highways, endless suburbs, giant malls, low-cost flights, mechanized agriculture, artificial fibers, and — above all else — the global enlargement of American power. As a result of the United States possessed mammoth reserves of oil, was the first to grasp the technology of oil extraction and refining, and probably the most profitable at utilizing petroleum in transportation, manufacturing, agriculture, and warfare, it emerged as the richest and most powerful country of the twenty-first century, a saga instructed with great relish by power historian Daniel Yergin within the Prize. Due to the expertise of oil, the U.S. was able to accumulate staggering levels of wealth, deploy armies and military bases to each continent, and management the worldwide air and sea-lanes — extending its power to each corner of the planet.
However, just as Britain experienced destructive penalties from its extreme reliance on coal, so the United States — and the rest of the world — has suffered in varied ways from its reliance on oil. To ensure the safety of its overseas sources of provide, Washington has established j petroleum geology korea tortuous relationships with foreign oil suppliers and has fought several costly, debilitating wars within the Persian Gulf region, a sordid history I recount in Blood and Oil. Overreliance on motor autos for personal and industrial transportation has left the country sick-geared up to deal with periodic provide disruptions and price spikes. Most of all, the huge increase in oil consumption — right here and elsewhere — has produced a corresponding enhance in carbon dioxide emissions, accelerating planetary warming (a course of begun throughout the first carbon period) and exposing the nation to the ever more devastating effects of local weather change.
The Age of Unconventional Oil and Fuel
The explosive growth of automotive and aviation journey, the suburbanization of great elements of the planet, the mechanization of agriculture and warfare, the worldwide supremacy of the United States, and the onset of local weather change: these were the hallmarks of the exploitation of standard petroleum. At current, a lot of the world’s oil continues to be obtained from just a few hundred giant onshore fields in Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Russia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, the United States, and Venezuela, amongst other nations; some additional oil is acquired from offshore fields within the North Sea, the Gulf of Guinea, and the Gulf of Mexico. This oil comes out of the ground in liquid kind and requires comparatively little processing earlier than being refined into commercial fuels.
But such standard oil is disappearing. In line with the IEA, the major fields that at the moment provide the lion’s share of worldwide petroleum will lose two-thirds of their manufacturing over the next 25 years, with their net output plunging from sixty eight million barrels per day in 2009 to a mere 26 million barrels in 2035. The IEA assures us that new oil will be discovered to replace those misplaced supplies, but most of this shall be of an unconventional nature. In the coming many years, unconventional oils will account for a growing share of the worldwide petroleum stock, finally becoming our primary supply of supply.
The identical is true for pure gas, the second most necessary source of world power. The global provide of conventional gas, like typical oil, is shrinking, and we are becoming increasingly dependent on unconventional sources of supply — especially from the Arctic, the deep oceans, and shale rock by way of hydraulic fracturing.
In sure ways, unconventional hydrocarbons are akin to standard fuels. Both are largely composed of hydrogen and carbon, and will be burned to supply heat and vitality. However in time the differences between them will make an ever-larger distinction to us. Unconventional fuels — particularly heavy oils and tar sands — have a tendency to possess a better proportion of carbon to hydrogen than standard oil, and so launch more carbon dioxide when burned. Arctic and deep-offshore oil require extra vitality to extract, and so produce greater carbon emissions in their very production.
“Many new breeds of petroleum fuels are nothing like typical oil,” Deborah Gordon, a specialist on the subject at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, wrote in 2012. “Unconventional oils are typically heavy, complicated, carbon laden, and locked up deep within the earth, tightly trapped between or sure to sand, tar, and rock.”
By far essentially the most worrisome consequence of the distinctive nature of unconventional fuels is their excessive affect on the atmosphere. As a result of they are often characterized by larger ratios of carbon to hydrogen, and usually require extra power to extract and be transformed into usable supplies, they produce more carbon dioxide emissions per unit of vitality launched. As well as, the process that produces shale gas, hailed as a “clean” fossil fuel, is believed by many scientists to cause widespread releases of methane, a very potent greenhouse fuel.
All of this means that, because the consumption of fossil fuels grows, rising, not reducing, quantities of CO2 and methane will probably be launched into the ambiance and, instead of slowing, world warming will speed up.
And here’s another downside related to the third carbon age: the production of unconventional oil and fuel turns out to require vast quantities of water — for fracking operations, to extract tar sands and extra-heavy oil, and to facilitate the transport and refining of such fuels. That is producing a rising threat of water contamination, especially in areas of intense fracking and tar sands manufacturing, along with competition over access to water provides among drillers, farmers, municipal water authorities, and others. As climate change intensifies, drought will grow to be the norm in lots of areas and so this competition will only grow fiercer.
Along with these and different environmental impacts, the transition from typical to unconventional fuels can have financial and geopolitical consequences hard to completely assess at this moment. As a start, the exploitation of unconventional oil and gas reserves from previously inaccessible regions involves the introduction of novel production technologies, including deep-sea and Arctic drilling, hydro-fracking, and tar-sands upgrading. One end result has been a shakeup in the worldwide energy business, with the emergence of progressive companies possessing the skills and dedication to take advantage of the new unconventional resources — a lot as occurred through the early years of the petroleum era when new companies arose to use the world’s oil reserves.
This has been especially evident in the development of shale oil and gas. In lots of instances, the breakthrough applied sciences on this field had been devised and deployed by smaller, threat-taking companies like Cabot Oil and Fuel, Devon Energy Company, Mitchell Energy and Development Corporation, and XTO Energy. These and comparable companies pioneered the use of hydro-fracking to extract oil and gasoline from shale formations in Arkansas, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, and Texas, and later sparked a stampede by larger energy companies to obtain stakes of their own in these areas. To augment those stakes, the enormous companies are gobbling up lots of the smaller and mid-sized ones. Among essentially the most conspicuous takeovers was ExxonMobil’s 2009 purchase of XTO for $41 billion.
That deal highlights an particularly worrisome characteristic of this new era: the deployment of large funds by big vitality companies and their monetary backers to amass stakes within the manufacturing of unconventional forms of oil and gasoline — in quantities far exceeding comparable investments in both typical hydrocarbons or renewable power. It’s clear that, for these firms, unconventional energy is the subsequent large thing and, as amongst the most profitable corporations in historical past, they are prepared to spend astronomical sums to make sure that they proceed to be so. If this means funding in renewable vitality is shortchanged, so be it. “Without a concerted policymaking effort” to favor the development of renewables, Carnegie’s Gordon warns, future investments within the power area “will probably proceed to move disproportionately toward unconventional oil.”
In other words, there might be an more and more entrenched institutional bias among vitality corporations, banks, lending agencies, and governments toward subsequent-technology fossil-gasoline manufacturing, solely growing the issue of establishing nationwide and international curbs on carbon emissions. This is obvious, for example, within the Obama administration’s undiminished assist for deep-offshore drilling and shale gasoline improvement, regardless of its purported commitment to reduce carbon emissions. It’s likewise evident within the rising international curiosity in the event of shale and heavy-oil reserves, whilst contemporary investment in inexperienced energy is being reduce back.
As in the environmental and financial fields, the transition from conventional to unconventional oil and gasoline will have a substantial, if nonetheless largely undefined, influence on political and navy affairs.
U.S. and Canadian companies are playing a decisive role in the development of lots of the important new unconventional fossil-gasoline technologies; in addition, a number of the world’s largest unconventional oil and gas reserves are positioned in North America. The impact of this is to bolster U.S. world energy on the expense of rival energy producers like Russia and Venezuela, which face rising competition from North American firms, and vitality-importing states like China and India, which lack the resources and technology to supply unconventional fuels.
At the same time, Washington appears extra inclined to counter the rise of China by seeking to dominate the worldwide sea lanes and bolster its army ties with regional allies like Australia, India, Japan, the Philippines, and South Korea. Many elements are contributing to this strategic shift, but from their statements it is evident enough that high American officials see it as stemming in vital half from America’s rising self-sufficiency in vitality manufacturing and its early mastery of the most recent manufacturing applied sciences.
“America’s new power posture permits us to engage [the world] from a position of larger power,” Nationwide Safety Advisor Tom Donilon asserted in an April speech at Columbia University. “Increasing U.S. energy supplies act as a cushion that helps cut back our vulnerability to international supply disruptions [and] affords us a stronger hand in pursuing and implementing our international security goals.”
For the time being, the U.S. leaders can afford to boast of their “stronger hand” in world affairs, as no other country possesses the capabilities to use unconventional resources on such a big scale. By in search of to extract geopolitical advantages from a growing world reliance on such fuels, nonetheless, Washington inevitably invites countermoves of assorted kinds. Rival powers, fearful and resentful of its geopolitical assertiveness, will bolster their capacity to resist American power — a pattern already evident in China’s accelerating naval and missile buildup.
At the identical time, other states will seek to develop their very own capacity to take advantage of unconventional sources in what is perhaps thought of a fossil-fuels model of an arms race. This will require appreciable effort, however such assets are broadly distributed across the planet and in time other major producers of unconventional fuels are certain to emerge, difficult America’s advantage in this realm (at the same time as they enhance the staying energy and global destructiveness of the third age of carbon). Sooner or later, a lot of international relations will revolve around these points.
Surviving the Third Carbon Era
Barring unexpected shifts in international policies and conduct, the world will turn into increasingly dependent on the exploitation of unconventional vitality. This, in turn, means a rise within the buildup of greenhouse gases with little chance of averting the onset of catastrophic local weather results. Yes, we may even witness progress in the development and set up of renewable types of energy, however these will play a subordinate position to the event of unconventional oil and gasoline.
Life in the third carbon period is not going to be without its advantages. Those who depend on fossil fuels for transportation, heating, and the like can perhaps take consolation from the truth that oil and pure fuel is not going to run out soon, as was predicted by many vitality analysts within the early years of this century. Banks, the vitality firms, and other financial pursuits will undoubtedly amass staggering profits from the explosive growth of the unconventional oil enterprise and international will increase in the consumption of these fuels. But most of us won’t be rewarded. Fairly the other. Instead, we’ll expertise the discomfort and suffering accompanying the heating of the planet, the scarcity of contested water supplies in lots of regions, and the evisceration of the pure panorama.
What may be done to chop brief the third carbon era and avert the worst of these outcomes Calling for higher funding in green vitality is important however inadequate at a moment when the powers that be are emphasizing the event of unconventional fuels. Campaigning for curbs on carbon emissions is critical, however will undoubtedly prove problematic, given an increasingly deeply embedded institutional bias toward unconventional vitality.
Wanted, along with such efforts, is a drive to expose the distinctiveness and the dangers of unconventional energy and to demonize those who choose to invest in these fuels rather than their inexperienced alternate options. Some efforts of this type are already underway, including student-initiated campaigns to influence or compel faculty and college trustees to divest from any investments in fossil-gasoline corporations. These, nonetheless, still fall wanting a systemic drive to determine and resist those chargeable for our growing reliance on unconventional fuels.
For all President Obama’s speak of a green know-how revolution, we remain deeply entrenched in a world dominated by fossil fuels, with the one true revolution now underway involving the shift from one class of such fuels to another. Unquestionably, it is a system for international catastrophe. To survive this period, humanity must develop into a lot smarter about this new kind of power after which take the steps necessary to compress the third carbon era and hasten within the Age of Renewables earlier than we burn ourselves off this planet.
Michael Klare is a professor of peace and world safety research at Hampshire College, a TomDispatch common, and the author, most not too long ago, of The Race for What’s Left, just revealed in paperback by Picador. A documentary film primarily based on his ebook Blood and Oil could be previewed and ordered at www.bloodandoilmovie.com. You can follow Klare on Facebook by clicking here.
Comply with TomDispatch on Twitter and be a part of us on Facebook or Tumblr. Check out the newest Dispatch book, Nick Turse’s The Changing Face of Empire: Particular Ops, Drones, Proxy Fighters, Secret Bases, and Cyberwarfare.