Debate & Evaluation For Activists & Trade Unionists
A belated change of celebration line An impartial initiative
Dozens of distinguished SWP Trades Unionists endorse the calls for of the Lindsey Oil Refinery strike committee!
Main SWP member Sean Vernell has initiated a ‘Unite to fight for jobs Petition’ to the Trades Union Congress at
This petition includes the assertion:
“We support the calls for of the Lindsey Oil Refinery strike committee.”
It has up to now been signed by around 200 trades unionists, including a considerable amount of main SWP trades union activists.
Oh, and its quite a good petition.
Here’s the complete textual content:
To: Trades Union Congress
An injury to 1 is an harm to all – unite to save jobs.
1000’s of construction employees have been out on unofficial strike at major sites throughout Britain. Because the jobs slaughter continues many working persons are rightly frightened for the future. The behaviour of the sub-contracting bosses, in housing Italian workers separately, adds to this concern and division.
Throughout the whole of Europe, including Britain, 1000’s of jobs are being lost day by day with no finish in sight. Governments have handed lots of of billions of pounds to the bankers but have told working people who they must pay the worth for the disaster. However there may be resistance. Last week one million French workers were out on strike towards Nicolas Sarkozy’s “reforms”, Greek employees and farmers have been preventing to defend their livelihoods, in Ireland four hundred employees are occupying Waterford Glass. In all of these examples of a fightback, the anger needs to be centered on those accountable -the employers and bankers out to guard their income, and their allies in authorities.
We oppose the unfold of neoliberalism across Europe, and support the unity of all employees household oil to defend jobs and dwelling requirements, equal pay, binding nationwide agreements negotiated by trade unions, and equal legal standing for all, no matter nationality. We oppose the ‘contracting out’ and privatisation system that makes use of competitors to drive down wages and circumstances.
We are able to sense the mood for a fightback in Britain. Nonetheless, the slogan “British jobs for British workers” that has come to prominence around the dispute can only result in deep divisions inside working class communities. The slogan, coined by Gordon Brown in his 2007 speech to Labour’s conference, is being taking over by the precise wing press and the Nazi BNP. These are forces that have all the time been bitterly hostile to the commerce union motion.
That is why, whereas supporting action to defend jobs, we believe that the action needs to be directed towards the employers and the contracting firms, not towards migrant workers. We congratulate these strikers who ejected the BNP from the picket line at Immingham, and we urge other strikers to do the same. We help the calls for of the Lindsey Oil Refinery strike committee.
We’d like a large drive to unionise all staff, and a campaign to defend all jobs and create new ones. Each worker will benefit from a campaign to unionise overseas staff in order to stop household oil employers from using them as a weapon in opposition to fellow workers. Most significantly, we should have unity if we’re to combat again in opposition to the results of the most severe financial disaster because the 1930s. “British jobs for British workers” is a slogan that focuses on what divides working individuals not what can unite them.
Every worker is facing the identical horrors within the face of recession. We can’t let ourselves be divided. We must always struggle for well-paid jobs with respectable circumstances for all.
• The march for workers’ rights, and for global and environmental justice on 28 March in London on the eve of the petroleum equipment service G20 summit. This protest is supported by some forty organisations together with commerce unions, the TUC, and campaigning teams. It is a protest towards the neo-liberal household oil insurance policies that have encouraged ‘contracting out’ and aggressive wage slicing.